What is Self-Governance?

What is Tribal Self Governance?

Tribal Self-Governance is an authority under the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (ISDEAA). It provides Tribal Nations the option to negotiate compacts and funding agreements to assume federal programs, services, functions, activities, and the associated funding. They can exercise meaningful authority and flexibility to plan, redesign, and administer those programs to meet their communities’ needs and priorities.

Tribal Self-Governance involves more than just a federal policy or an administrative procedure; it is the exercise of Tribal sovereignty, which means that Tribal Nations can make decisions, set their priorities, and manage their programs and resources in a way that reflects the needs, values, cultures, and aspirations of their people.

For many years, Self-Governance has moved decision-making away from the remote federal authorities and has put it where it should be—with the Tribal governments who know their own communities best. As a result of Self-Governance, Tribal Nations have restructured their health care systems, strengthened their families, revived their languages and cultures, looked after their lands and natural resources, built up their infrastructure, increased economic opportunities, improved public safety, and come up with innovative solutions that federal programs generally could not provide.

One can see its success not just in the programs that Tribes run but also in the achievements of the Tribal Nations because of the freedom and flexibility they have been given in governing. Self-Governance has enabled the strengthening of Tribal institutions, the development of local capacity, the creation of services that are more responsive, and the reconnection of governmental programs with the cultures and communities they are meant to serve.

And the impact reaches far beyond Tribal communities.

Tribal Nations are coming up with solutions to the kinds of challenges that society as a whole faces—such as protecting watersheds and restoring ecosystems, responding to wildfires, improving rural health systems, dealing with behavioral health and substance use, supporting families, preserving biodiversity, adapting to climate change, and building more resilient economies and communities. In many of these areas, Tribal Nations are not just receiving the benefits of public policy; they are innovators who are showing what effective public policy might look like.

The promise of Tribal Self-Governance lies in the fact that when Tribal Nations have the power, resources, and flexibility to develop their own solutions, they not only strengthen their own communities but also provide us all with knowledge, innovation, and leadership.

Self-governance is about placing trust in Tribal Nations and acknowledging the possibilities that arise when they take on governance.

Tribal Self-Governance is most fully realized through the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (ISDEAA), which remains the gold standard for transferring meaningful authority, funding, flexibility, and decision-making from the federal government to Tribal Nations. Through ISDEAA, Tribes can assume federal programs and functions, redesign them to meet local priorities, and exercise substantial control over how services are delivered and resources are used.

But the principles of Self-Governance extend beyond ISDEAA. A growing number of federal laws and programs incorporate key Self-Governance tenets by reducing federal control, increasing Tribal decision-making authority, consolidating or transferring federal resources, and recognizing that Tribal governments are best positioned to determine how programs and lands affecting their communities should be managed.

Authorities such as Public Law 102-477, the HEARTH Act, Tribal Transportation Self-Governance at the Department of Transportation, the Tribal Forest Protection Act, and other co-stewardship and co-management mechanisms each provide different tools for expanding Tribal control and advancing self-determination.

These authorities are not interchangeable, and most do not provide the same breadth of authority, funding protections, flexibility, or legal framework available under ISDEAA. Together, however, they reflect a broader and increasingly important policy principle: Tribal Nations should have the authority and resources to make decisions, manage programs, care for lands, and develop solutions based on their own priorities, values, and vision for the future.

ISDEAA remains the strongest expression of that principle—but it is also part of a larger movement toward putting Tribal governments in the driver’s seat.

What is ISDEAA?

The Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act of 1975 (ISDEAA) is the cornerstone of the federal government’s commitment to Tribal self-governance.

It is the most tested, most confirmed, and most widely embraced authority in Indian Country — giving Tribal Nations the legal framework to assume direct control of federal programs, activities, and resources that affect their communities and lands.

Title I of the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (ISDEAA) provides an option for Tribal Nations and Tribal organizations to negotiate Self-Determination contracts, often called “638 contracts,” to assume responsibility for federal programs, services, functions, and activities (PFSAs) that would otherwise be administered by the federal government for the benefit of Tribal communities.

With a Title I contract, a Tribe can run eligible PFSAs and get the funding the federal government would have used for these services. This marked a major change, as it recognized that Tribal governments could manage programs for their own communities instead of relying on direct federal service.

However, Title I does not give Tribes as much flexibility and independence as Self-Governance under Titles IV and V does. The process follows more of a federal contracting model, and the federal government continues to oversee the contract, approve some program changes, and set rules for how the PFSAs are managed.

So, while Title I gives Tribal Nations much more control than when the federal government runs programs directly, it usually offers less freedom to change programs, move resources, or make management decisions compared to Self-Governance under Titles IV and V of ISDEAA.

Put simply, Title I lets the Tribe run federal programs, but the federal government still helps define and oversee how those programs work.

Read more

Title IV of the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (ISDEAA) establishes Tribal Self-Governance authority within the Department of the Interior. It provides an option for eligible Tribal Nations to negotiate Self-Governance compacts and funding agreements to assume responsibility for federal programs, services, functions, and activities (PFSAs), along with the associated funding.Title IV of the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (ISDEAA) establishes Tribal Self-Governance authority within the Department of the Interior. It provides an option for eligible Tribal Nations to negotiate Self-Governance compacts and funding agreements to assume responsibility for federal programs, services, functions, and activities (PFSAs), along with the associated funding.

Read more

Title V of the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (ISDEAA) establishes permanent Tribal Self-Governance authority within the Indian Health Service (IHS). It provides an option for eligible Tribal Nations and Tribal organizations to negotiate Self-Governance compacts and funding agreements to assume control over IHS programs, services, functions, and activities (PSFAs), or portions of them, along with the associated funding.

Read more

Other related authorities

Tribal Transportation Self-Governance at the Department of Transportation

The Tribal Transportation Self-Governance Program (TTSGP) provides an option for Tribal Nations to take greater control over certain transportation programs and funding administered by the U.S. Department of Transportation. The program, created by the FAST Act and codified at 23 U.S.C. § 207, allows Tribes to negotiate a Self-Governance compact and funding agreement with DOT to manage eligible transportation programs, services, functions, and activities (PSFAs).

The program is partly based on Tribal Self-Governance under ISDEAA and uses some ISDEAA rules, but it is a separate law. Its goal is to give Tribes more flexibility, control, and decision-making power over eligible DOT transportation funding, while cutting down on unnecessary paperwork.

With a DOT Self-Governance agreement, a Tribe can combine eligible transportation funding and programs that would normally be handled through different DOT processes. This might include Tribal Transportation Program funding, Tribal Transit Program formula funding, and other DOT funding the Tribe qualifies for, if it meets the rules for each funding source.

Read more

Public Law 102-477: Integrating Employment, Training, and Related Services

Public Law 102-477 (“477”) gives Tribal Nations and Tribal organizations the authority to combine eligible federal employment, training, education, and related-service programs into a single, coordinated Tribal plan. Rather than administering multiple federal programs through separate funding streams, eligibility processes, budgets, and reporting systems, a Tribe can integrate participating programs and resources to create a more comprehensive system designed around its own workforce and community priorities.

With an approved 477 Plan, a Tribe chooses which eligible federal programs to combine. This allows them to coordinate services, pool funding, simplify administration, and use more flexibility to help people based on their needs instead of following separate federal rules. The goal is to improve services, cut down on paperwork, support Tribal economic growth, and help Tribes reach their own goals.

Read more

Self-Governance and 477 both provide Tribes greater flexibility, but they do it in different ways.

Self-Governance is principally about who controls and administers a federal program, while 477 is principally about integrating funding from multiple programs into a single Tribal plan.

ISDEAA is primarily an assumption authority. It allows a Tribal Nation to assume responsibility for eligible federal programs, services, functions, and activities (PFSAs) that the federal government would otherwise administer. Through a Self-Determination contract or Self-Governance funding agreement, responsibility for carrying out those federal functions—and the associated federal funding—is transferred to the Tribe.

In contrast, 477 is mainly about integration. It usually does not give Tribes the right to take over a federal program. Instead, it lets a Tribe combine and redesign eligible employment, training, and related service programs and funding that it already has the right to receive, bringing them together into one Tribal system.

In practice, they can be complementary authorities. A Tribe can use Self-Governance to assume eligible programs and use 477 authority to integrate eligible employment, training, education, and related services.

Put simply, ISDEAA gives Tribal governments responsibility for federal programs, while 477 lets Tribal governments break down federal funding barriers and combine eligible programs into a system that matches Tribal priorities.

Read more

HEARTH Act: Advancing Tribal Control Over Tribal Lands

The Helping Expedite and Advance Responsible Tribal Home Ownership Act (HEARTH Act) provides an option for Tribal Nations to assume more control over leasing and using their trust and restricted lands. With this law, a Tribe can create its own leasing rules and send them to the Secretary of the Interior for approval. After the rules are approved, the Tribe can handle and approve surface leases on its own, without needing the Department of the Interior to sign off on each lease.

This change is a big step forward for Tribal self-determination. Instead of depending on the Bureau of Indian Affairs to review and approve each lease, Tribal Nations that take part can set up their own systems, make decisions in their own communities, and shape leasing policies to fit their own needs and goals.

The HEARTH Act can help Tribes reach many goals, such as building homes, growing businesses, farming, using renewable energy, offering recreation, and supporting culture and education. Because the Act cuts down on federal steps for each lease, it can help Tribes get projects done faster and make planning for housing, business, and infrastructure more predictable.

The HEARTH Act is not the same as ISDEAA. It does not give Tribes control over a federal program. Instead, it takes away a layer of federal approval and gives Tribal governments more direct control over their own lands.

Simply put, the HEARTH Act lets Tribal Nations stop asking the federal government for approval on each land lease. Instead, they can make those decisions themselves, if they follow their own leasing laws that have been approved by the federal government.

Read more

Tribal Forest Protection Act: Advancing Tribal Stewardship of Federal Lands

The Tribal Forest Protection Act (TFPA) gives Tribal Nations a way to suggest and complete projects on U.S. Forest Service lands that are next to their own forests or rangelands. This law helps Tribes address threats such as wildfires, disease, and poor forest conditions and supports efforts to restore the land.

TFPA supports Tribal self-determination by letting Tribal Nations take a bigger part in deciding how nearby federal lands are restored and managed. When reviewing Tribal proposals, the law allows for factors like treaty rights, cultural and historical ties to the land, biological and archaeological details, and the knowledge and skills of Tribal members to be considered.

This law became even more important when Congress allowed certain TFPA projects to be carried out through ISDEAA “638” agreements. With this change, Tribes and Tribal organizations can handle the management and other tasks for approved TFPA projects using a special ISDEAA contract process.

TFPA is more focused than the broader Self-Governance options under Titles IV and V of ISDEAA. It does not give Tribes the general right to take over Forest Service programs. Instead, it offers Tribes an option to be partners in managing and restoring federal land projects that impact their homelands, resources, cultures, and communities.

Read more
Get in Touch

Interested in learning more about Tribal Self-Governance?